Explanation of the Qualitative Values in a Space with a view on the Capabilities of Vernacular Architecture: Case Study: Context-Based Architectural Schools

Document Type : Original Article


Department of Architecture, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran


The aim of the current study has been based on explaining the introduction of hidden and apparent factors in the context and ground of architecture, which can be influenced by it in the process of audience’s educability from a new aspect; therefore, the “data-based theory”, which is one of the newest qualitative research methods, was applied and in order to demonstrate its efficiency, Yazd faculty of Architecture was selected as the case study in order to explain the stages of conducting this research step by step. data analysis was carried out based on the three methods of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Then, according to the theories of Strauss and Corbin, the validation methods of qualitative research were applied. The findings of this research at the final stage indicated 28 open codes, 16 axial codes, and 6 selective codes and the paradigmatic pattern was organized as follows: 1. Causal variables, 2. Contextual variables, 3. Intervening variables, 4. Pivotal phenomenon, 5. Strategies, and 6. consequences and results. The results of this research indicate that by aligning the goals of academic education with executive principles, on the one hand, and recognizing the identity values in the evaluative view on place, on the other, we can accurately integrate the hidden and apparent capabilities of education in line with the audience’s psychological training.


  1. Ahari, Z. (2011). City, celebration, memory; reflection on the proportion of urban spaces and festivals during the Safavids and Qajars. Fine Arts Journal:Architecture and Urbanism,47: 5-16. (In Persian).
  2. Alitajer, S. and Zarei Haji Abadi, F. (2016). The role of the environment built in student interactions in the informal spaces of architectural schools (Case study: faculty of Art and architecture, university of Bu'ali and faculty of fine arts of Tehran university), Fine Arts Journal: Architecture and Urbanism, 21(1): 79-90. (In Persian).
  3. Bently, I. and Alcock, A. and Murrain, P. and Mcglynn,S. and  Smith, G. (2007). Responsive Environments. Translation by Mostafa Behzadfar. Tehran: University of Science and Industry Publications, 3nd Edition. (In Persian).
  4. Berger, P. and Luckman, Th. (2016). Social Creation of Reality (Annotation in Sociology of Cognition). Translation by Fariborz Majidi. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. (In Persian).
  5. Bisadi, M. and Mozafar, F. and Hosseini, S.  B. (2013). Spatial characteristics affecting creator creativity in architectural and urban research centers, Training Technology Journal, 7(3): 239-249. (In Persian).
  6. Canter, D. (1977).The facets of place: Advances in environment behavior and design, toward the integration of theory, methods, research and utilization .New York: Plenum. 4: 109-147.
  7. Carmona, M. (2009).Public Places, Urban Spaces, Architectural Press. Elsevier. Oxford.
  8. Charmaz, K. (2008).Grounded Theory as an Emergent Method. The Guilford Press: New York & London: 155-170.
  9. Creswell, J.W. (2005). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach, 2nded. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  10. Ferasatkhah, M. (2016). The Method of Research in the Social Sciences, with Emphasis on the Theory of the Foundation (Grounded Theory GTM).Tehran: Nashr Agah Publications. (In Persian).
  11. Gehl, J. (1987). Soft Edges in Residential Streets, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Journal, 3: 89 –102.
  12. Gohari, A. and Behbahani, H. and Salehi, I. (2015). ‘Urban-historical landscape analysis on the basis of mental perceptions).Case study: Tajrish neighborhood (’. Space Ontology International Journal (SOIJ). 4(3): 39-48. (In Persian).
  13. Groat, L. and Wang, D. (2007). Architectural Research Methods. Translation by Ali Reza Eynifar.
  14. Tehran: University of Tehran Publications, 7nd Edition. (In Persian).
  15. Habibi, M. (2000). Urban space, event yard and collective memories.  Journal of Scientific Research of Sofeh.28: 16-21. (In Persian).
  16. Kalantari,E. and  Mohajeri, A. and Qaneierad, M  A.(2015). Measuring social acceptance of human simulation technology in academic community. Journal of Science and Technology Policy,6 (4): 35-48. (In Persian).
  17. Kasali, A. and Dogan, F. (2010). Fifth, sixth, and seventh- grade students’ use of non-classroom spaces duringrecess: The case of three private schools in Izmir. Turkey: Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30:518-532.
  18. Lang, J. (2004). Creation of Architectural Theory: Role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Translation by Ali Reza Eynifar. Tehran: Tehran University Publications, 2nd Edition. (In Persian).
  19. Lansdale, M. and Parkin, J. and Austin, S and Baguley, T (2011). Designing for interaction in research environments: A case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 31:407- 420.
  20. Lynch, K. (2016). Shape of the City Theory. Translation by Hosein Bahreini. Tehran: University of Tehran Publications, 7nd Edition. (In Persian). 
  21. Mahooti, G and Tabibian, M. (2019). ‘Identification and investigation of effective factors on the development of the tourism industry in Bandar-eAnzali by Delphi method’ Space Ontology International Journal (SOIJ). 8(4): 1-14.(In Persian).
  22. Mannheim, K. (2017). Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Cognition. Translation by Fariborz Majidi. Tehran: Samt Publications. (In Persian).
  23. Mehrabi, A  H. and  Khanifar ,H  and Amiri , A  N. and  Zareei Matin ,H. and Jandaghi ,Gh  R . (2011).The introduction of the methodology of the grounded theory of the foundation for Islamic research (providing an example). Journal of Organizational Culture Management,23: 5-30. (In Persian).
  24. Norberg Schultz, Ch. (2012). Architecture: Presence, Language, and Location. Translation by Ali Reza Seyed Ahmadiyan. Tehran: Nilufar Publications, 3nd Edition. (In Persian).
  25. Pakzad, J and Bozorg, H. (2014). An Introduction to Environmental Psychology for Designers, Tehran: Armanshahr Publications, 2nd Edition. (In Persian)
  26. Pallasmaa, J. (2014). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Translation by Ramin Ghods. Tehran: Parham Naghsh Publications. 2nd Edition (In Persian).
  27. Peters, K. Elands, B. and Buijs, A. (2010),Social interactions in urban, parks: Stimulating social cohesion, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 9: 93-100.
  28. Piravi Vanak, M. (2010). Phenomenology to Merleauponty.Abadan: Question Publications. (In Persian). 
  29. Qaneierad, M.  A. and  Rashtiani, A. (2015).Scientific socialization and body management in the university (Case study: Graduate students of Tehran University). Journal of Sports and Youth Strategic Studies, 14 (28): 1-25. (In Persian).
  30. Saldana, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Translation by Abdollah Givian. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. (In Persian).
  31. Samadi Ahari, A. and Sattarzadeh, D. (2019). ‘Evaluating quality of life in different social setting (Case study: Magsudiyeh district, Molla Zeynal district, and Roshdiyeh district in Tabriz, Iran).’ Space Ontology International Journal (SOIJ) 8(3): 45-60. (In Persian).
  32. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Grounded Theory. Translation by Ebrahim Afshar, Tehran:Nashre Ney Publications,4nd Edition. (In Persian).
  33. Tajbakhsh,G. (2004). Walter Benjamin: A transformation of experience and memory in modern times and modern metropolis. Fine Arts Journal,30: 5-16. (In Persian).
  34. Yousefi, M. and Simon A. and Raeisi, I and Soheili, J.and Rahbarimanesh, K. (2019). ‘Investigation of the ability to redefine the components of popular architecture facades in contemporary architecture from semiotics point of view (Case study: Poonak zone of Qazvin)’. Space Ontology International Journal (SOIJ). 8(3): 75-90.(In Persian).